As a sports fan and a lover of Christmas, I’ve recently been following quite possibly one of the biggest battles of the century brewing right before us. Hard to ignore, it’s in our faces everyday whether we realize it or not. The real showdown of the season won’t play out under stadium lights in the NFL’s weeknight battles, nor on the NBA hardwood where Christmas Day basketball has become a ritual of its own.
It won’t be settled in a title bout or buzzer-beating slapshot on the NHL ice, or any arena where athletes chase glory for cheering crowds. Instead, the matchup of the year will unfold in the long fluorescent aisles of Walmart and Target, where shopping carts replace playbooks and every purchase becomes a point on the board. This Christmas has its contenders, and America, whether it realizes it or not, is watching a championship fight of holiday icons.
Column: Charlie Brown-style real trees are superior: snowshoes are optional
In one corner stands Santa Claus — the seasoned veteran, the league’s all-time leading scorer in goodwill, the franchise player whose legacy predates every dynasty in American lore. And in the other waits the Grinch — once an unpredictable rogue off the bench, now a sculpted commercial powerhouse with global endorsements, billion-dollar merchandising, and a highlight reel that grows brighter every season. What began as a storybook rivalry has become the holiday equivalent of a heavyweight title match, a Super Bowl of spirit versus salesmanship, tradition versus reinvention. And the crowd, spread across millions of living rooms and checkout lines, is just settling in.
For generations, Santa presided unchallenged over the holiday imagination, a benevolent monarch in red velvet. But this year, he faces a rival whose ascent has been quiet, strategic, and startlingly effective. Walmart has crowned the Grinch its official spirit of the season, splashing his smirk across Times Square billboards and stitching him into a holiday ad blitz that runs through NFL broadcasts.
Target, in return, has embraced Santa — not the ironic, flirtatious Santa of recent viral campaigns, but the classic version, the familiar figure meant to remind Americans who we once were. The result feels less like marketing than a confrontation between two visions of Christmas: one spiritual, one commercial. And so the question hangs in the air, whispered in checkout lines and scrolling through social feeds: has the Grinch actually stolen Christmas?
That question grows sharper once we recognize the widening gulf between cultural reach and commercial reach in American life. Santa is a cultural giant — the embodiment of myth and memory, a story whispered on Christmas Eve, a ritual carried from parent to child. He belongs to everyone and therefore to no one. He cannot be centralized, franchised, or pitched in a quarterly earnings meeting. There is no Santa sales team knocking on corporate doors in July, no boardroom where executives plan “Q4 Santa Strategy.” Santa appears precisely once a year, arriving with mystery, not metrics.
What Americans think about giving cash as holiday gifts, according to a new poll
The Grinch, by contrast, is a creature of pure commercial reach. He is owned, intellectual property: renewable, expandable, endlessly franchisable. He has year-round representation. He has branding cycles, licensing calendars, synergistic partnerships, and merchandising pipelines. He has corporate muscle behind him. In a world governed increasingly by the economics of attention, the Grinch enters each holiday season with the machinery of capitalism at his back, where Santa enters with only the magic of memory.
In an era when commerce often overwhelms culture, the Grinch has become the improbable beneficiary. His rise did not happen overnight. After the 1966 television special, How the Grinch Stole Christmas! the Grinch settled into American culture as a beloved seasonal outsider — iconic, quotable, ritualized, but untouched by the machinery of modern holiday capitalism. His annual appearance on network television made him part of the emotional fabric of December, yet he remained a figure of story rather than commerce, a myth without a marketplace. That stasis shattered in 2000, when Jim Carrey’s explosive portrayal transformed the Grinch into a box-office giant and, for the first time, a fully monetizable franchise. The film launched an avalanche of merchandise and established the Grinch as a character who could no longer be confined to a single night of primetime nostalgia. Over the next decade, retailers learned a lesson that reshaped the holiday economy: characters with ownership and narrative depth could drive sales in ways generic symbols never could. The Grinch didn’t just survive this shift — he became its proof of concept.
CT holiday light displays offer joyful colorful celebrations. See the ones that do so much more.
That groundwork set the stage for the true turning point in 2018, when animation juggernaut, Illumination, creators of Despicable Me and Minions rebooted the character into what would become the highest-grossing Christmas film in history. Armed with global marketing, year-round licensing strategies, and the full force of modern brand synergy, the Grinch entered a new stratosphere — no longer a seasonal figure, but a commercial empire with its own aesthetic, merchandise ecosystem, and cultural momentum. By the time the credits rolled on that holiday season, the Grinch had overtaken nearly every character-based Christmas property in retail presence and market influence. What began in 1966 as a simple fable about a lonely creature on a mountaintop had, through decades of cultural affection and strategic commercialization, evolved into one of the most powerful forces shaping the modern Christmas economy.
Santa, meanwhile, remains spiritually and socially potent but perhaps commercially impractical. He cannot be owned, cannot be reimagined, cannot be stretched into a cinematic universe without rupturing his myth. His power lies in what cannot be monetized — which may very well be why he seems to be losing ground in a country where the monetizable often eclipses the meaningful.
And so we arrive at this peculiar crossroads, watching Walmart and Target — the two largest retailers in the nation, if not the world — offer competing visions of December. There is something almost poetic about it: the global titans of commerce, those vast engines of modern consumption, now serving as the unlikely referees in a contest over the spirit of Christmas. One leans into the precision-engineered allure of a character optimized for profitability, a green mascot with a marketing department behind him twelve months a year. The other returns to the old cultural anchor who survives not through strategy, but through sentiment — a figure held aloft by memory, myth, and the soft glow of childhood nostalgia. And so we must ask: What does it say about Americans today that the Grinch enjoys a year-round corporate apparatus while Santa Claus walks into December alone, with nothing but tradition and goodwill at his back? What does it say about the spirit of Christmas when the character with the largest marketing budget becomes the one most likely to define it?
Perhaps it signals not an ending, but a transformation — not a loss of wonder, but a shift in where Americans believe wonder can be found. The Grinch’s rise reflects a culture increasingly fluent in the language of commercialization, a culture that knows how to navigate aisles of novelty and nostalgia with equal ease. He mirrors the modern holiday economy: fast, bright, a little ironic, always ready for its close-up. Santa, meanwhile, remains the keeper of the emotional core — the warmth we return to not because an ad campaign told us to, but because something in us still stirs at the sound of sleigh bells and the sight of a red coat against fresh snow. Santa represents who we hope we are. The Grinch represents who we sometimes suspect we’ve become. Yet Christmas, in its stubborn resilience, has always found a way to hold both truths in the same warm breath.
So has the Grinch officially stolen Christmas? The answer will not be declared by Walmart’s billboards or Target’s endcaps, nor by analysts tracking Q4 performance. It won’t even be determined by the millions of Americans wandering those aisles with lists and budgets and memories in their hands. No, in this perennially unsure economy, it can not be. It will emerge in the small choices: the movie played for the hundredth time, the ornaments hung, the traditions repeated even when the world feels new and unsure. When the receipts are tallied and the wrapping paper settles, this season will reveal something deeper than what we bought. It will show what we believed — about ourselves, about each other, and about a holiday that is fighting to survive its first real cultural reinvention in over a century since Saint Nicholas left Greece, for the Netherlands to become Sinterklass, before hitting the shores of America to be the Santa Claus we know today.
The irony should be lost on no one, that in 1957, Theodor Geisel — the man we know as Dr. Seuss — wrote How the Grinch Stole Christmas! during a period of personal frustration with the growing commercialization of the holiday season. Seuss later reflected when looking back on that particularly grumpy Christmas season, that when he looked in the mirror, he realized, “I was the Grinch.” That confession explains much about the character’s original purpose: he was not meant to be a mascot, a villain, or a franchise, but a satirical mirror of American culture’s tendency to bury meaning under merchandise.
This year will decide whether the Grinch has truly stolen Christmas, or whether Santa still has one more miracle left in him.
Kennard Ray is a Hartford native, seasoned entrepreneur, and political strategist who writes about culture, community and our changing society.